فيلم وثائقيالسنة2011المدة1h 25mIMDb7.1

إذا سقطت شجرة: قصة عن جبهة تحرير الأرض

فيلم وثائقيBiographyجريمة

في محاولة لحركة تحرير الأرض التي ظهرت في النصف الثاني من تسعينيات القرن الماضي لوقف المجزرة التي ترتكبها الشركات الكبرى ضدّ ما تبقى من أشجار في الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية، وردة فعلها اتجاه هذا ووقوف التشريعات والقوانين ومؤسسات فرض القانون إلى جانب هذه الشركات. تدور أحداث الفيلم.

شاهد الآن

الإعلان الترويجي

طاقم العمل

SC

Sam Cullman

Director

Marshall Curry

Director

DM

Daniel McGowan

Self - Earth Liberation Front Activist

LM

Lisa McGowan

Self - Daniel's Sister

Tim Lewis

Self - Activist & Filmmaker

KE

Kirk Engdall

Self - Assistant U.S. Attorney

JF

Jim Flynn

Self - Former Editor, Earth First Journal

JS

Jenny Synan

Self - Daniel's Girlfriend

SS

Susan Synan

Self - Jenny's Mother

BB

Bill Barton

Self - Native Forest Council

LJ

Leslie James Pickering

Self - Former ELF Spokesman

GH

Greg Harvey

Self - Detective, Eugene Police Department

CT

Chuck Tilby

Self - Captain, Eugene Police Department

SS

Suzanne Savoie

Self - Daniel's Ex-Girlfriend

SS

Steve Swanson

Self - President, Superior Lumber

CW

Chuck Wert

Self - Executive Vice President, Superior Lumber

DR

Don Rice

Self - Manager, Jefferson Poplar Farms

JF

Jake Ferguson

Self - Earth Liberation Front Activist

DM

Dan McGowan

Self - Daniel's Father

LR

Lauren Regan

Self - Daniel's Legal Team

Marshall Curry

Writer

Matthew Hamachek

Writer

قد يعجبك أيضًا

فيلم وثائقي★ 6.7

Marilyn Monroe Declassified

فيلم وثائقي★ 6.7

Mr. Angel

فيلم وثائقي★ 7.7

العثور على فيفيان ماير

فيلم وثائقي★ 5.6

Easy Love

فيلم وثائقي★ 6.4

الوصية: قصة النبي موسى

فيلم وثائقي★ 7.4

Sean Combs: The Reckoning

فيلم وثائقي★ 7.5

Who Killed Malcolm X?

فيلم وثائقي★ 7.3

Conversations with a Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes

فيلم وثائقي★ 5.8

Who Killed Tupac?

فيلم وثائقي★ 7.2

Dark Side of the '90s

فيلم وثائقي★ 8.6

Muhammad Ali

فيلم وثائقي★ 8.2

The Trials of Winnie Mandela

wolves of blood moon

دراما★ 7.4

Saints & Sinners

the rise of lycan queen

فيلم وثائقي★ 7.7

شاك

فيلم وثائقي★ 8.1

Inside the American Mob

فيلم وثائقي★ 7.1

Conversations with a Killer: The John Wayne Gacy Tapes

فيلم وثائقي★ 5.9

Confronting a Serial Killer

فيلم وثائقي★ 6.7

ظل إبستين: غيسلين ماكسويل

فيلم وثائقي★ 7.2

Dynasty: The Murdochs

فيلم وثائقي★ 7.7

Mr. McMahon

فيلم وثائقي★ 7.7

Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes

فيلم وثائقي★ 6.8

القضية الغريبة لناتاليا جريس

التعليقات

10 تعليق

Srijana KoiralaMar 20, 2026

El maria de luxeJul 24, 2024

If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front

Pratikshya_sen 🦋May 29, 2023

source: If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front

L11 ورطه🇱🇾May 23, 2023

What do you do if you feel something terrible is happening, and the cause of that terrible thing is systematic? - that is, the systems for governing our world offer no possibility of change, because they themselves are part of the problem. Either you accept the system, or you fight it - and if your methods include violence, you thereby become a terrorist, and (in a sense) an enemy of those who chose to work within the system instead. The Earth Liberation Front were a group of ecological activists who took to arson; and whose members eventually wound up in gaol. This film allows them to present their case, and interestingly, they come over as intelligent and thoughtful and not in the least wild or woolly in their thinking. To its credit, the film also interviews some of their targets and those responsible for their prosecution, who are not demonised and who also come over as human. The only thing I struggled with was the insistence of front members that they weren't terrorists. I rather think they were - but this thought-provoking documentary raises the question of whether being a terrorist is always wrong, and doesn't offer easy answers in either direction.

AbbasMay 23, 2023

"If A Tree Falls," is a documentary about the ELF (earth liberation front) and the fires they set in protest of the parks services, forest service, and logging. It's an interesting movie, and somewhat educational. On purely technical aspects alone I give it an 8. It did a good job of laying out everyone and everything involved, all sides, including prosecutors, law enforcement, environmental activists, and a few of the ELF extremists. Now for the spoiler alert. This documentary ends up trying to get the viewer to weigh in on not the actual events, but on whether or not these people are terrorists and deserve to go to a prison designed specifically for terrorists. My answer is yes. They try to justify their unlawful actions by saying they took great care in planning so no one would be injured or killed. The fact is they planned and carried out a Federal crime and burnt down other people, and our government's property to incite a reaction. They paint the main character of this film as a really nice guy, who got caught up in something dumb. Well he should have thought about the consequences when he did it. Besides, I am sure there are a lot of terrorists, murders, arsonists, etc. around the world, that if you asked their families, would say that their child was "such a good boy." He ended up being sentenced to 7 years in the Supermax prison for terrorists. I guess he will have plenty of time to think about it now. Arson is a serious crime that COULD have caused injury and death, and I after the first fire the ELF members should be called terrorists, because if you were in that area and owned a business I am sure you would be afraid someone might burn your business down at anytime. Once the government gets done with these people I sure hope they go after that adolescent Paul Watson from "Whale Wars" for piracy. The police were cast in a bad light in this movie as well. Environmentalists, as they always do, tried to paint law enforcement as some nazi jackboot thugs. They show people at a Pacific Northwest location involved in a protest "sit-in," and Police wiping and spraying pepper spray in their eyes. The whole time these protesters are saying things like,"Please don't hurt me," or," Please don't spray me. Well, you were asked, then told to leave. If you don't leave the police have an obligation to remove you. Stop getting your panties in a bunch and leave if you don't want to be sprayed. Anyways, for technical reasons this movie is a pretty good one.

user51 towieMay 23, 2023

I've seen this trend in documentary films, particularly in American ones: the story of a social movement or something wrong going on is told from the point of view of an affected individual, more often than not delivering not only information but a sentimental message, trying to make you emphatize with that particular individual. For me, that's a mistake. When a cause is wrapped up around a single person and becomes a personal issue rather than an universal fight, the whole thing sinks down under just "a" story. Thus my summary comment: "the" story would have been better, without the whole sentimental filling. Now, I ordered the DVD expecting to get more information about the ELF and related issues. I certainly did, although I had to cope with a lot of those sentimental fillers. Don't get my wrong, I do think that seeing what happens to someone involved with the ELF is educational, although there's no need to go that deep into Daniel's own life. You get involved knowing the repercussions, I'm sure people supporting the ELF emphatize with Daniel McGowan, and detractors will say "that's what he deserves". Then, again, why going so much into Daniel's private life details, not directly involving the ELF or environmental issues but rather trying to show his defects? For those wanting to get involved in the environmental movement, that may only scare them away. OK, some (if not all) of the stuff will simply anger these people, which in return will create, perhaps, an action. From my European point of view (and environmental activist, as well), I don't see the sentimental lines fitting anywhere. Alright, I'll stop repeating myself now. As I was saying, you will find useful information here (I discovered, among other things, the rare film "PiackAxe"). I didn't watch the extras yet, but I hope I will find even more nice information here -without fillers-. I believe the film also try to portrait ELF people like "humans too" by showing their mistakes and weakness'. Hm, about that, let's just say that activists should take it as a what-not-to-do list rather than a pointing finger. I still don't see any so-called mistakes there, even though I do see how messed up is to betray your comrades for money or other selfish reasons (being able to walk free hand by hand with your child is more valuable than fighting against the total destruction of our natural world, right? If your child doesn't have air to breathe in the future but the one sold by the same corporations that destroyed the planet, you will be long gone by then, so who cares...). Summarizing, worth watching, even with its flaws. If just for the informative value. If you can focus on what really is important, you will find the destruction mankind bring for greed. And, hopefully, will do something about it.

Abo amirMay 23, 2023

A good documentary about a fascinating subject, but it opened up a lot of questions and left me wanting more. For example, a look at Wikipedia shows you that ELF did not begin randomly in Oregon in the late 90s, but in fact started in the UK and Europe. I wanted to learn more about these organizations - their views, their actions, and their leaders. The documentary shows pictures of the people involved, but we learn very little about them, and often don't even hear their names. One of them was even described as a rich, foxy internet executive, who did a little arson on weekends - but who the heck was she? Also, the trials aren't covered at all. However, the filmmakers do give us a full look at one of the group's leaders, a seemingly harmless soul named Daniel "Sorrel" McGowan, and we also get to see interviews with detectives and prosecutors who worked hard on the case, and got the ELF labelled terrorists. They were not terrorists because they did not kill random civilians - what they did was destroy property. And the fires they set are nothing compared to the fires that are burning in Oregon as I write this because of climate change.

Kone Mouhamed MoustaMay 23, 2023

In 2005, former Earth Liberation Front (ELF) member Daniel McGowan is arrested, along with a dozen others, in a co-ordinated operation to bring to justice those responsible for a series of arson attacks over the previous decade. McGowan is implicated for his role in a number of these attacks, and faces a double life sentence if he continues to refuse to take a plea (and, in doing so, turn on his former comrades). Under house arrest in his sister's New York apartment, McGowan invites Marshall Curry in to document the period up to his imprisonment. The ELF are not an easy organization to categorize; formed seemingly out of the believed futility of peaceful and non-violent demonstration to protect the 'raping' of the environment, they use economic warfare (in the form of property destruction) to make their points instead. McGowan, a late-comer to the organization but one who quickly uses his charm and passion for the cause to rise through the ranks, does not deny any of the charges laid before him. Rather, Curry is granted insider accounts from not merely the arrestee but also a number of his co-conspirators (even, most notably, the snitch who gave McGowan and his accomplices up in the years after the arson attacks). Curry's film is not a propaganda film for McGowan, or even the ELF; it doesn't throw statistics at you regarding the extent of logging or the dangers of genetically-modified food (two of the organization's targets for attacks). Rather, it serves to establish a landscape more complex than the simplistic 'eco-terrorist' slur used to describe McGowan et al, without necessarily demanding sympathy for their bleak position and future. The ELF's case is nevertheless made strongly: in all the EDF's actions - and they number over 1200 incidents - not a single human casualty results, and the targets are invariably large organizations and corporations. The eco-warrior McGowan is at pains to stress their actions as mere 'property destruction', and it is hard to argue otherwise - particularly with the poignant NY backdrop - yet Curry is even-handed enough to also interview the workers and families of those whose workplaces have been destroyed. To them, the destruction of property is not a means to an end (however noble), but a misunderstanding of what it is they do. An Oregonian logging executive, whose offices were targeted by the ELF in 2001, is therefore equally convincing in arguing that by definition, he is also an 'environmentalist' - for every tree his business cuts down, six have to be planted, and further, if there were no trees left, there would be no logging business either. The points raised on both sides are relevant and thought-provoking; it is patently clear no- one is out to do serious harm, either to the environment or to the workers, yet both sides remain at loggerheads over whose supposed 'crime' is worse. And while the battle goes on, everyone continues to suffer. There is clearly a middle-way between the tree-hugging environmentalism of the ELF and the business-savvy but ecologically-dependent corporations and businesses they target, but why hasn't it been found? Concluding Thought: MacGowan may well not be a 'terrorist' in the sense of a suicide bomber seeking maximum casualties, but the arson attacks are undoubtedly intended to instill a degree of fear to encourage desired political action. That is still terrorism.

GerlinePresenceDélicMay 23, 2023

One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter is and old tired cliché but in this film that quote seems yet again to ring true. This doc explains why a group of environmentalists started to radicalize when they felt that corporations, police and politicians no longer listen to them. Their solution? Firebombing various facilities that according to them(later they found that some of their targets really didn't support harm to the environment, but actually the opposite)was posing a threat to the environment. This solution was extreme, and got the FBIs attention who started investigating their attacks. Slowly but surely FBI was closing the net but biggest question remained, was this domestic terrorism? And should it be viewed as domestic terrorism? For a viewer, like me, who never been involved in radical political organizations this film poses a lot of interesting questions, such as how far are you willing to go for your ideals? And also how easy is it to push idealistic youngsters to commit worse crimes then just illegal demonstrations, vandalism etc? It should be seen by anyone interested in why, how, people regardless of political views easily can be persuaded to commit crimes in order to get their agenda, message, across. So if you liked docs like Neverland: The Rise and Fall of the Symbionese Liberation Army (2004), The Weather Underground (2002),One Day in September (1999)etc then you should see this one.

rehan2255May 23, 2023

Great documentary showing the people who are willing to fight back against the corporations that are not only willing to destroy and pillage mother nature for profit but are happy to do so. Do I agree with their tactics? No, but am I happy there is now a new extreme fighting back against the other extreme? Yes. For too long corporations have done what they please without caring for anything but the money lining their pockets. This documentary shows the people who where willing to stand up and say enough is enough. Peaceful protests just fell on deaf ears and ended with pepper spray to the eyes and testicles. These guys had enough, they knew for a fact that their protests where not going to change anything so they had to turn it up notch. Corporations would not listen to their cries and simply didn't care so ELF decided to hit them in the only place they care about, their pockets. This documentary follows the story of one of these protesters who decided to fight back and stand up for what he thought was right. Should these people be considered terrorists? No, they should be considered arsonists. If the government defines these people as terrorists then what name should be given to the corporations who drove these people to take these actions? Again I do not condone the actions of these people but they are the lesser of two evils in this situation.

اختيارات مميزة

هل تريد المزيد من الترفيه؟ استكشف منصة الألعاب المقترحة ووجهة الدراما القصيرة التي نوصي بها.

ألعاب فورية

Gamixo

العب ألعاب المتصفح الخفيفة مثل الألغاز والورق والرياضة والتحديات السريعة خلال ثوانٍ.

دراما قصيرة

VSKIT Drama

شاهد المسلسلات القصيرة الرائجة وقصص الرومانسية والدراما الجديدة مع تحديثات يومية سريعة.