دستاویزی فلمسال2015دورانیہ1h 29mIMDb7.1

Art and Craft

دستاویزی فلم

When one of the most prolific art forgers in US history is finally exposed, he must confront the legacy of his 30-year con.

ابھی دیکھیں

ٹریلر

کاسٹ

Mark Becker

Director

SC

Sam Cullman

Director

Jennifer Grausman

Director

MA

Mark A. Landis

Self

LS

Lester Sullivan

Self

IL

Irwin Lakov

Self

ML

Matthew Leininger

Self - registrar, Cincinnati Art Museum

MT

Mark Tullos

Self - museum director, Hilliard Museum

JC

Jill Chancey

Self - curator, Lauren Rogers Museum of Art

ER

Ellen Ruffin

Self - curator, De Grummond Collection

AC

Aaron Cowan

Self - history professor, University of Cincinnati

PH

Patty Hall

Self - Hattiesburg Arts Council

DE

Donna English

Self - Mark A. Landis' former caseworker

KL

Katie Leininger

Self - Matthew C. Leininger's daughter

SH

Sandra Holifield

Self

CW

Chris Watkins

Self

آپ کو یہ بھی پسند آ سکتا ہے

دستاویزی فلم★ 7.1

Art and Craft

دستاویزی فلم★ 3.9

Addicted to Sexting

دستاویزی فلم★ 7.6

Wick Is Pain

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.9

Rat Film

دستاویزی فلم★ 5.2

Sex Next Door

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.9

Sex, Explained

دستاویزی فلم★ 7.2

The Business of Drugs

دستاویزی فلم★ 9.2

Our Planet

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.3

Marines

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.1

Trust Me: The False Prophet

دستاویزی فلم★ 7.4

The Walking Dead: Origins

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.8

Michael Jackson: The Verdict

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.4

Rich & Shameless

دستاویزی فلم★ 7.0

Money, Explained

دستاویزی فلم★ 8.0

Explained

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.4

Eat the Rich: The GameStop Saga

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.1

Paranormal Caught on Camera

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.3

The Takedown: American Aryans

دستاویزی فلم★ 7.3

The UnXplained

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.9

Should I Marry a Murderer?

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.3

Black Love

دستاویزی فلم★ 7.0

Engineering Catastrophes

دستاویزی فلم★ 7.0

Murder 360

دستاویزی فلم★ 6.3

Curse of the Bermuda Triangle

تبصرے

10 تبصرے

Khalil MadcouriNov 24, 2025

Ngwana modimo🌙🐄Nov 24, 2025

skawngurNov 24, 2025

JordanApr 28, 2023

This is a brilliant documentary and a fascinating study of a man who may be no more real than the forgeries he creates and gives away. The movie cleverly begins as an investigative movie, leading us to believe it could be about the greatest art forger in modern history. While it remains about that person, it turns into something else as well: a keen observation of an individual building his identity from pieces of others. The film explores his "artistic" process, but equally explores the psychological underpinnings of his behavior. By the end, you'll question if he is a brilliant and deceptive manipulator, or an emotionally stunted man-child who doesn't even fully understand the ramifications of his actions. It is powerful to realize that it could credibly be either (or both).

Catty MurrayApr 28, 2023

One of my favorite types of documentaries is definitely the "eccentric character study," and this entry is no slouch. I don't know whether to applaud or despise Landis. I recommend it.

Thereal.phrankieApr 28, 2023

The oh-so-smug people who threw the reception at the end have to get a life. What were you hoping for? This odd man, with clear and known social/mental health issues, falling down to his knees in front of everyone and asking for forgiveness for donating his work to institutions? It's art. It's all art. His actions, efforts and ideas are all art. If it got in the way of people profiting from art, so be it. If it embarrassed curators and researchers, well, perhaps you could curate and research a little better. If he apologized for fooling museums at the end, it would have ruined the movie for me. I see this man as the means by which art will thrive moving forward. More people are looking at art because of what he's done. You don't have to take Van Gogh's work and make a laser show out if it to get people to value art. You just have to have people like this man to make everyone want to look harder, longer and more often at art in general.

🌑🌒🌓🌔🌕🌖🌗🌘🌑Apr 28, 2023

Everybody loves art, it doesn't matter what form of art, it's something we enjoy looking at. So to have somebody like Mark A. Landis copying some of the greatest artists' works is worth debating. It's clear Landis needs some help, he's clearly on the spectrum. Should he be in prison? I don't think so. Should he been instutitionalized? Probably, or certainly if he continues plagerizing, because that's what he basically does, and that's still punishable by the law. It doesn't matter if he donates his copies, he still does it with the intention to fool everybody, so yes he perfectly knows what he's doing. Everybody can have his opinion about the matter but to me he's definitely a criminal. If he would copy all those art pieces and hang them in his house, that's a whole other thing. That would be his hobby and personal collection. But that's not what he's doing, he signs his works with the signature of the original artist and that's a crime. Landis is a weird person, he reminded me of Norman Bates from Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho, talking about his 'mother' in an almost obsessive way. That man needs help, that's for sure. I will never get why he's just not painting his own stuff, he's clearly talented. Matthew Leininger on the other hand reminds me of Bookman from Seinfeld. He's a bit too obsessed by the whole case, it was almost sad to see his daughter being dragged into this, but without him those falsified works would probably still hang in all those museums. So a big thanks to him for his persistance. The documentary is well made, it's awkward but informative. I have no clue why Landis hasn't been on trial yet because he should. I guess they have bigger things on their mind than preserving the integrity of the artwork.

RajChatwaniApr 28, 2023

What a bizarre tale, offering an interesting contrast to the case of Wolfgang Beltracchi and other mercenary, opportunistic falsificateurs such as Guy Ribes. (Note that none of these men attempt to create exact forgeries of existent works by an artist X but instead create new works ¨in the manner of X¨). But as Mark Landis himself sagely observes, ¨Everyone is the same but everyone is different." I must say that Landis bears an eerie resemblance to Norman Bates, with his strange persona and evident obsession with his mother. Fortunately, he is not a murderer, just an artist who found an odd way to achieve affirmation by the art world. In the end, this film actually reveals more about the institution of art than the artist, just as in the case of films about Beltracchi, GIbes, Banksy, et al. Raises some interesting questions about psychiatry as well, given that Landis was hospitalized and heavily medicated at the age of seventeen, right after his father died, which was very traumatic to him. One has to wonder whether all the drugs he was continuously plied with did not have something to do with what he eventually became. He seems to have lived off of both an inheritance and public disability aid, obviating the need to work or derive money from his fakes, at least as far as I can gather from the film. I am pretty sure that if Landis had tried to donate his fake paintings to larger, more famous institutions with more sophisticated staff persons, he would have been discovered much sooner. I imagine that the curators who were duped are thoroughly humiliated, especially given that some of his techniques were so brash. Xeroxing a picture and using it as a physical layer of the final art work? Really?

JoaoConz.Apr 28, 2023

highly recommended for person who is interested in art and psychology. this documentary is very original and almost unbelievable. it captures the life of an introverted artistic genius with OCD and mother issues. his madness played a part in his seclusive attitude. it takes a person with some kind of obsessive personality to copy artwork with precision and fool dozens of major museums and universities. This guy was no joke and he did all his amazing work while watching TV with a TV dinner. no kidding. I am an artist and I appreciated his genius. the other guy trying to bring him out as a "fake" is also insane for following a topic that not even major universities and museums wanted continue investigating. most importantly I don't believe that he is a bad person because he followed what he loved and only donated his hobby.

Priscys VlogApr 28, 2023

For film that mainly focuses on documenting an odd, old man with very strange behavior, it's very well put together and is fascinating to watch. As for the critique on here about not exploring the "Why?" surround his behavior, I think the film let's you answer that yourself. It presents all the information in a neutral way and doesn't form an opinion or spoon feed the viewer. Perhaps there is are no answers to - Does he know what he's doing? Is he a bad person? Is he malicious or does he think he's helping in some way? It's a tribute to the film that you aren't left with answers. You'll be talking about this film long afterwards.

Featured Picks

مزید entertainment چاہتے ہیں؟ ہمارے recommended gaming hub اور short-drama destination کو explore کریں۔

Instant Games

Gamixo

Puzzles، cards، sports اور quick challenges والے casual browser games چند سیکنڈ میں کھیلیں۔

Short Drama

VSKIT Drama

Trending mini-series، romance stories اور نئے short dramas کو fast daily updates کے ساتھ دیکھیں۔